Legal Opinion

Albro v. Blume

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Anton F. Blume and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Flew York Special Term, bearing date the 5th day of December, 1895, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Flew York confirming the report of a referee in surplus proceedings in a foreclosure action.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J. :

This was a proceeding to obtain surplus moneys in an action for foreclosure. The premises which were sold belonged to one Joseph Blume, to whom they were conveyed on the 14th day of July, 1892, by the appellant Anton E. Blume and Mary Y. Blume, his wife. The respondent, Mrs. Styles, claimed to have a lien on the premises by virtue of a judgment which she recovered against Joseph Blume on the 21st day of June, 1895. It was declared in the judgment that it should be a lien on the premises which were described in the mortgage in this case, from the 19th day of July, 1893, that being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zoeller v. . RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Fliess v. . BuckleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Delafield v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sadow v. Poskin Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Davison v. MacDonaldNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Martens v. O'NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Woodenbury v. SpierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Ellis v. SalomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API