Legal Opinion

Wortham v. Baxter

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 31, 1978No. 5162PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADBURY, Justice.

This is a summary judgment case regarding the disposition of assets under the will of Nettie Harper. Plaintiff, Mildred Baxter, and defendant, Thomas Wortham, both moved for summary judgment agreeing that the will was not ambiguous requiring a construction but a declaration of its provisions was required. Plaintiff's motion was granted. We affirm.

The pertinent provisions of the will are:

“HI.

C. I do hereby bequeath and devise unto my beloved sisters, Charlie Shaw Fifley, Tiny Shaw Winsett and Willie Shaw Edwards all of the right, title and interest that I shall own at the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Caples v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Guilliams v. KoonsmanTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Chadwick v. BristowTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Bufford v. HollimanTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Trimble v. FarmerTexas Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Longoria v. Lasater, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  2. Zoila v. Longoria v. Edward A. Lasater, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  3. Zoila v. Longoria v. Edward A. Lasater, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API