Singleton v. Greymar Associates
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the summary final judgment of foreclosure. Even though an earlier foreclosure action filed by appellee was dismissed with prejudice, the application of res judicata does not bar this lawsuit. The first foreclosure action sought relief due to appellants’ failure to make payments from September 1, 1999 onward, with interest accruing from August 1, 1999 through February 1, 2000; this foreclosure action was based on appellants’ failure to make payments from April 1, 2000 onward, with interest accruing from March 1, 2000 through July 1, 2001. The second action involved a new and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Capital Bank v. NeedleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Olympia Mortgage Corp. v. PughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3Cited by13 opinions
- Singleton v. Greymar AssociatesSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- & SC14-1266 & SC14-1305 Lewis Brooke Bartram v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. & The Plantation at Ponte Vedra v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. & Gideon M.G. Gratsiani v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
- Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. BeauvaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. BartramDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- In re Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.