Legal Opinion

People v. Narayan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1981PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*110OPINION OF THE COURT

Jones, J.

The contention that the trial court interfered with defendant’s constitutional right to assistance of counsel was not preserved for appellate review inasmuch as no timely protest was registered. Because the Appellate Division erred as a matter of law in addressing the issue on the alternative predicates that the contention of error had been preserved or that, if it had not been preserved, preservation was not required, the case must be remitted to that court for reconsideration.

Defendant’s trial on an indictment charging him with murder in the second degree,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. People v. ArthurNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. FelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Downs v. LapeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. People v. SpearsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. UmaliNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. The People v. Benny GarayNew York Court of Appeals · 2015

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API