Legal Opinion
Lexjac, LLC v. Bd. of Trs. of Muttontown
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 8, 2017No. 16-3357-cv(L)Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
16‐3357‐cv(L) Lexjac, LLC v. Bd. of Trs. of Muttontown UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURTʹS LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ʺSUMMARY ORDERʺ). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Giuffrida v. Citibank Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dykeman v. SymondsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Landau v. PercaccioloNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hill v. Delaware North Companies Sportservice, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Landau v. PercaccioloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.