Legal Opinion
Russek v. Angulo
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 21, 1921No. 1272. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from District Court, El Paso County ; P. R. Price, Judge. Action by Melquíades Angulo agáinst David S. Russek and others. Judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHarper, C. J.
This action is predicated upon the following instrument:
“Certified Receipt of Deposit.
“David S. Russek & Co., Private Bankers, “Chihuahua, Mexico, Dec. 13, 1919.
“The Mr. Engr. Melquíades Angulo has deposited with Messrs. David S. Russek & Co., the amount of $10,000.00 ten thousand & 00/100 pesos national gold (Mexican gold), to his credit and order of himself payable at the presentation of this certificate on the 13th of June, 1920, plus interest at the rate of 8% per annum from this date.
“David S. Russek & Co.,
“Ep. p.] By Aurelio E. Ramos.”
The defense offered is that the writing is a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ricaud v. American Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Minero v. Ross and MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Phœnix Bank v. RisleySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Thompson v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Barreda v. Milmo Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Garcia v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.