Velasquez v. Franz
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentStein, J.
In this extraordinary case, plaintiffs products-liability claim against a dissolved Illinois corporation was dismissed by a federal court because the injury had occurred twelve days after dissolution and Illinois law bars post-dissolution claims. As explained in more detail hereafter, the federal court should not have applied literally Rule 17(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Federal Rules), which compelled reference to Illinois law in determining defendant-corporation’s capacity to be sued, but should instead have applied New Jersey choice-of-law rules and, in all likelihood, New…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.