Stinfil v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the conviction and sentence of the appellant. In so doing, we recede from Hernandez v. State, 575 So.2d 1321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), approved on other grounds, 596 *672So.2d 671 (Fla.1992), to the extent that Hernandez held that because of the authoritative positions held by two police officers and a teacher, their testimony that they believed a child victim’s accusations in a sexual assault trial could amount to reversible error even absent the defendant’s lack of objection at trial. Hernandez, 575 So.2d at 1322.
In this case, the prosecutor’s questions to an investigating deputy and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Glendening v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Lambrix v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Spradley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Gray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998