Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Weigle v. Russell

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County

Decided April 2, 1963No. 296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rossiter, J.,

The above entitled petition for a writ of habeas corpus most aptly illustrates how reckless of the truth and how inaccurate a relator can be, either knowingly or unknowingly, in telling what happened to him.

In the relator’s history of his case which is the basis of his plea for release on habeas corpus, he states the following:

-History”

“1. Your petitioner avers he was tried without a hearing before a magistrate and convicted upon false charge by an illegal presentment of perjured testimony.
“2. Your petitioner avers said testimony did not *754support the verdict rendered and further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Elliott v. BaldiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Miller v. BanmillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Sherman v. District AttorneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Weigle v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API