Legal Opinion

Cruz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 19, 1998No. 96-3549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Antonio Maria Cruz (“defendant”), appeals his conviction and sentence for first degree murder. We affirm finding no error in the trial court’s evidentiary rulings.

The defendant first argues the trial court erred in admitting his confession which was obtained after the defendant invoked the right to remain silent. We disagree.

When the police took the defendant to the homicide office to question him about the murder, the defendant initially waived his rights, and initially denied any knowledge or involvement in the victim’s murder. After one-half hour, the defendant told the officers he did not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lovelace v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Blanco v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API