Legal Opinion
Winfree v. Mann
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 12, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEpes, J.
The question here in issue arises out of an attachment proceeding instituted in the Corporation Court for the *686city of Lynchburg by John B. Winfree, Jr., arid other perferred stockholders- of Smith-Briscoe Shoe Company, Incorporated, against Isaac T. Mann, principal defendant, and Pocahontas Fuel Company, Incorporated, codefendant, seeking to recover from said Mann damages for alleged torts committed by him while an officer and director of Smith-Briscoe Shoe Company, Incorporated, which it is alleged resulted in pecuniary loss to said plaintiffs.
The merits of the claim asserted by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southern Sand & Gravel Co. v. Massaponax Sand & Gravel Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Moore v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- McAllister v. Guggenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- VonSeggern v. WillmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Arthur G. Cohen, and Steven M. Terk Marvin B. Tepper Lawrence M. Goodman Ilyne R. MendelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. BridgemanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Fauquier National Bank v. Hazelwood Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- Bishop v. WebsterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.