Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Park Sav. Bank

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 7, 1938No. 6635Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

Three grounds are argued on the petition for rehearing. There is nothing in the first two grounds that is not discussed in the opinion.

The third ground is that the language of section 7069, Alabama Code of 1928, properly construed, shows that the expiration of the charter by limitation of itself does not work a forfeiture, but that there must be expiration accompanied by a dissolution proceeding. The language of the statute is: “Corporations whose charters expire by limitation and which are dissolved by forfeiture or by any other cause, except by judicial decree,”…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pankey v. LippmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Cohen v. PavlikSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Anderson v. BuckleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API