Legal Opinion

Addison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 10, 1987No. BM-86PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NIMMONS, Judge.

In sentencing appellant as an adult, the trial court failed to comply with the requirements of Section 39.111(6), Florida Statutes (1985), which mandates that, when sentencing a juvenile as an adult, the trial court must explain in writing why adult sanctions are appropriate. The sentence must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing. State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984); Johnson v. State, 371 So.2d 556 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1979).

Appellant also asserts an ex post facto violation by reason of the trial court’s assessment of costs under Section 27.-3455(1),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RhodenSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Lawton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Slaughter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API