Legal Opinion

Baddock v. Baltimore Cnty.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 28, 2018No. 1271/17Published

1Opinion of the CourtZarnoch, J.

*472 In Alice in Wonderland , the blue caterpillar appeared content to smoke a hookah by day. Here, we primarily consider whether legislation requiring hookah lounges to close at midnight violates due process and equal protection guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 24 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights. Finding no Constitutional or other legal infirmity, we uphold the *473 restriction as a valid exercise of Baltimore County's police power.

BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In May 2014, the Baltimore County Council passed a bill that requires hookah…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Governor of the State v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Frey v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API