Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Patterson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 4, 1952No. 4103PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, C. J.

Although the plaintiff’s declaration made no reference to the express contract between the parties, it was introduced in evidence and the case was tried as if their rights were determined by it. No objection has been made to the form of the plaintiff’s pleading. Accordingly, the case is treated as one of special assumpsit on a written contract.

The finding that the plaintiff did not produce a customer willing and able to buy does not dispose of the plaintiff’s claim for a commission. Under the provisions of the agreement, “Exclusive Authorization to Sell,” not only would the plaintiff earn a…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whitney Investment Co. v. Westview Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Julius Tofias & Co. v. John B. Stetson Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Mellos v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Leadership Real Estate v. HarperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  5. Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API