J. Ray McDermott & Co. v. Hudson
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Parker
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court affirming four board of equalization decisions fixing the tax valuation of oil which was produced by plaintiff in the Ash Creek Fields but for lack of pipeline facilities there was trucked at plaintiff’s expense to Salt Creek, the point of sale, some 138 miles distant.
For 1952, the first year of operation, plaintiff reported on the form provided by the board the full selling price of the oil without deducting any transportation charges. For 1953 and 1954, plaintiff reported the selling price less the cost of transportation to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Bunten v. Rock Springs Grazing Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Hammermill Paper Co. v. ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Salt Creek Transp. Co. v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Miller v. Buck Creek Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization, Department of Revenue & TaxationWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Basin Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Amax Coal Co. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Long v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.