Gause v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentSchwelb, Senior Judge, joined by Washington, Chief Judge, and Kramer and Thompson, Associate Judges,
The judges who join in this dissenting opinion adhere to1 or generally agree with2 the opinion of the division majority in Gause v. United States, 959 A.2d 671 (D.C.2008) (Gause I).3 We therefore re*1259spectfully dissent from the decision of the en banc court.
I
The issue which divides the court is whether Gause and Wilkey are required to make a very modest threshold showing, i.e., reasonable belief or suspicion that a violation of the DCJSA may have occurred, before being granted discovery of, and access to, confidential records and documents to which the general public has no access, and before…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Test v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.