Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Oakland Motor Co. v. Meyer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1930No. 3587PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The lease attached as an exhibit contains no covenant on the part of either landlord or tenant to repair, except in the case of the tenant as the same may be inferred from the following language: “and at the end of said term it” (the tenant) “will deliver up said premises in as good order and condition as they now are or may be put by the said lessor, reasonable use and ordinary wear and tear thereof and damage by fire or other unavoidable casualty, condemnation, or appropriation excepted.”

In the absence of statute, ordinance, express stipulation, or covenant, the lessor is not bound to make…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goodall v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Freedline v. CielenskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Hensel v. ChildressOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. JESPERSEN v. Deseret News Pub. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Levine v. KelloggOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Skinner & Andrews Co. v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API