Legal Opinion

Mainor v. Midvale Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeals, Nos. 31 and 10PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case, both the employer, Midvale Company, and the Commonwealth have filed appeals from the order of the court below in remitting the record to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for more specific findings of fact.

Mary B. Mainor, claiming to be the common law wife and widow of William Mainor, filed a fatal claim petition on December 6, 1956 under the Occupational Disease Act as a dependent. In this petition she set forth that her marriage to William Mainor took place in 1940. Both appellants filed answers to this petition denying, in effect,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baker v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Stevenson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Buradus v. General Cement Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Stauffer EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. David v. BELLEVUE LOCUST GARAGECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Lind v. Argo Lamp Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Earley v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. E. W. Coslett & Sons, Inc. v. BowmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Milburn v. MilburnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API