Lewis v. Marsters

The case was heard below by the presiding justice, without a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts. Decision was for the plaintiff, and the matter is brought here on the defendant’s exceptions.

*19The plaintiff claims that the exceptions are not properly before us, because the right to take exceptions had not been reserved. But it is too late to raise that point. The bill was allowed by the presiding justice, and the assent of the plaintiff thereto is shown by the “seen and agreed to” memorandum thereon, signed by her attorney. See Graffam v. Casco Bank & Trust Company, 137 Me., 148, 16 A.…