Legal Opinion

Christensen MacH. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1931No. J-370PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

Plaintiff brings this suit to recover certain sums specified in the petition paid at different times on its taxes for 1920, 1921, 1923, and 1924, alleged to have been collected by the defendant in excess of the amount legally due. The issue in the ease is whether the plaintiff is entitled to deductions from gross income for the years in controversy on account of payments made for a certain contract with one Christensen, to which reference will hereinafter be made more particularly.

There is no material conflict in the testimony, but the parties dispute as to the inferences and…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Gazette Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Falstaff Beer, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Maier v. Publicker Commercial Alcohol Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. H. H. Hornfeck & Sons, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API