Legal Opinion

Daniele v. Puntillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 31, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

In this action, plaintiff attorney seeks fees for services rendered in a matrimonial proceeding. Plaintiff was retained by defendant in March 2004, replacing defendant’s prior counsel in her divorce proceeding. It is undisputed that plaintiff and defendant executed a retainer agreement in March 2004. The agreement specified the nature of representation, a $25,000 retainer fee, billing arrangements and payments, and billing rates, among other details. Attached to the retainer agreement was a Statement of Client’s Rights and Responsibilities, also executed by both parties in March 2004.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. FlanaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Coleman v. Putnam Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Edelman v. PosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Kurtz v. KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Miller v. Metropolitan 810 7th AvenueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API