Legal Opinion
Niagara of Florida, Inc. v. Niagara Therapy Manufacturing Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 14, 1970No. 69-36PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
The trial Court was correct in rendering its final judgment against the appellants-plaintiffs upon motion for directed verdict at the conclusion of appellants’ case, and concluding that the oral contract sued upon was within the Statute of Frauds, F.S. § 725.01, F.S.A.
Appellant Harrison testified that it was the intent of the parties that performance of the contract would extend at least three years. We affirm the judgment appealed on authority of Yates v. Ball, 1937, 132 Fla. 132, 181 So. 341; Markowitz Bros., Inc., v. John A. Volpe Const. Co., D.C.S.D. Fla.1962, 209 F.Supp.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Yates v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Berger v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Exchange Nat. Bank of Tampa v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Schenkel v. Atlantic National Bank of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Royal Automotive Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- First Realty Inv. Corp. v. GallaherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Hesston Corp. v. RocheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Thomas J. Merlo v. United Way of America, and Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Davis v. FerraroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974