Legal Opinion

Darling v. Commercial & Savings Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The trial court denied claimant’s motion to amend the claim by substituting for the note dated June 30, 1934, which was lost, note for $400 dated January 29, 1934. The court denied the motion on the ground that the time for filing claims having expired claimant was not entitled to file the $400 note. The trial court made this ruling upon the authority of Estate of Von Nobel (1941), 239 Wis. 233, 1 N. W. (2d) 76. The trial court was correctly of the opinion that the proposed amendment, if allowed, would materially alter the claim as filed. The dates of the notes are different. The amounts are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Estate of Von NobelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Shea v. SheaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. M & I Bank v. First American National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Davidson v. HockingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API