Legal Opinion
Samuel v. Langham
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided January 9, 1992No. Civ. A. 4-91-652-APublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
McBRYDE, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the motions of plaintiff, Donald R. Samuel, M.D. (“Sam uel”), to remand and for sanctions. The court, having considered the motions, the responses filed by defendants, Charles G. Langham, III., M.D. (“Langham”), and All Saints Episcopal Hospitals of Fort Worth, Inc., (“All Saints”), the record and the applicable authorities, finds that the action should be remanded and that Samuel should have recovery from All Saints of his costs and actual expenses incurred as a result of the removal.
NATURE OF THE CASE
Samuel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Ethridge V. Harbor House RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Bova v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- Thomas H. Burks v. Amerada Hess Corporation and Alan FullerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Rozzell v. Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Delgado v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.