Legal Opinion

The Grotius, Sheafe, Master

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1815PublishedCited by 8 opinions

THIS case was continued from last term, for further’ Prooí> (&ee ante> 8> P° 456) and was now submitted, upon the further proof produced, without argument.

1Opinion of the CourtWashington, J.

This case comes before the Court upon an order for ^P^her proof, ma’de at the last session in relation to the validity of the alledged capture of this vessel. The master, the mate and two of the seamen of the Grotius, in answer to somé of the standing interrogatories, swore, that they did not consider the ship to have been seized as prize,;,and that the young man who was put on board by Odiorne, the captain of the privateer, was received and considered as a passenger during the residue of the voyage. The deposition of Very, the alleged prize-master, ivas taken and read in the Court below, ih…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wu Tien Li-Shou v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. The Hellig OlavCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. The Job H. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1908
  4. (HC) Koenig v. KoenigDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. (PC) Torres v. MayDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API