Legal Opinion
Five Boro Psychological Services, P.C. v. AutoOne Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 9, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed without costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, by order entered October 16, 2008, insofar as appealed from, the Civil Court denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion “to the extent that plaintiff shall. . . respon[d] to defendant’s discovery requests on the subject of corporate status and/or other issues not precluded by defendant’s failure to timely deny the subject claims . . . [and] plaintiff must produce…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rivera v. BuckAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- Victory Medical Diagnostics, P.C. v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceNassau County District Court · 2012
- Fresh Acupuncture, P.C. v. Interboro Insurance Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- Fresh Acupuncture, P.C. v. Interboro Ins. Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017