Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided June 24, 2014No. 2012-KM-01883-COAPublished

1DissentJames, J.

¶ 47. Because it appears that the justice court did not have original jurisdiction to entertain this action, I respectfully dissent.

¶ 48. Williams alleges, as one of his assignments of error on appeal, that the justice court exceeded its jurisdiction under Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-23-103 (Rev.2006), by trying a claim involving $5,000 or more. This issue is not addressed in the majority opinion. Section 97-23-103(5)(a), which deals with misdemeanor home-repair fraud, provides in part: “A first conviction under this section shall be a misdemeanor when the amount of the fraud is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bramlette v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ivy v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Conner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API