Legal Opinion
Piesco v. di Francesca
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel W. Eager, J.
This action is brought for a judgment declaring the invalidity of the zoning ordinance of the Village *130of Piermont insofar as it affects plaintiffs’ waterfront lands. The plaintiffs, other than the plaintiff Kracke, own two adjacent lóts situate in said village and abutting the Huson Biver. The complaint was dismissed on the trial as to the plaintiff Kracke for lack of standing and interest as more fully pointed out on the trial.
The plaintiff Piesco owns a lot (No. 44) fronting 63.3 feet on the east side of Piermont Avenue and extending back approximately 140 feet (137.1 feet on one side and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Myer v. MyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Wardrop Co. v. Fairfield Gardens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- In re CornellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Junar Construction Co. v. Town BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Town of Islip v. PowellNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. RiveraCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1983