Legal Opinion

Forever Living Products U.S. Inc. v. Geyman

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 18, 2006No. CV 06-1814-PHX-PGRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROSENBLATT, District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) and Defendants’ Motion to Transfer to United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Doc. 2). The Court now rules on the motions.

I. INTRODUCTION

On July 21, 2006, the Defendants removed this action from the Maricopa County Superior Court to this federal forum. On the same day, the Defendants filed the present Motion to Transfer to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Richard M. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Pebble Beach Company, a California General Partnership v. Michael Caddy, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API