Legal Opinion

Candee v. Daying

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 15, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

Bills of particulars are of two kinds; one appertains to an account between parties, the other to a claim of one party. The rules governing the right to the one or other are different. Giles agt. Bets (15 Abb. Pr., 285) refers to the latter, while Williams agt. Shaw (4 Abb. Pr., 209) refers to the former, and is a special term decision. From the brief memorandum it seems to me the learned judge did not appreciate the difference between a bill of particulars of an account and one of a claim.

This action is to recover -an indebtedness on an account for goods sold and delivered. Upon a demand,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. ShawNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Giles v. Betz.The Superior Court of New York City · 1862

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tarpey v. Jersey Co-operative Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API