Thomas v. City of Grand Junction
Colorado Court of Appeals
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
The purpose of this action, instituted by a taxpayer of the defendant city, is to restrain the city from the issuance of its bonds for the purpose of the construction of a new system *81of waterworks to be used in supplying tbe city with water. The judicial determination of the questions necessarily involved in the issues presented will also determine the question as to whether or not the city, under existing circumstances as presented by the record, has the power at all to construct a system of waterworks of its own. All of the questions are purely legal, the case having been presented and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamilton Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Hamilton CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Merrill v. MonticelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Brenham v. German American BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- White v. City of MeadvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Richardson v. FarwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892