Legal Opinion
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Salisbury
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided December 18, 2018No. AC 17-P-1609PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWolohojian, J.
*595 At issue here are two abutters' (Northvision, LLC [Northvision] and Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. [Clear Channel] 3 ) competing *1221 efforts to erect digital billboards in the town of Salisbury. Only one such application could succeed because no two digital billboards may be erected within 1,000 feet of each other. 700 Code Mass. Regs. § 3.17(5)(g) and (h) (2012). The ultimate decision as to whether a digital billboard (and which one, in the case of competing proposals) is approved rests with the Department of Transportation Office of Outdoor Advertising (OOA). However, an applicant must first…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Davis v. Zoning Board of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- 81 Spooner Road, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Dowd v. Board of Appeals of DoverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- New England Medical Center, Inc. v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Montgomery v. Bd. of Selectmen of NantucketMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- McLaughlin v. Zoning Board of Appeals of DuxburyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2023
- Outdoor Meida Properties, Inc. v. PawlisheckMassachusetts Land Court · 2021
- Reeve v. ThompsonMassachusetts Land Court · 2021
- Wood on Wood Road, Inc. v. KarllMassachusetts Land Court · 2021