Legal Opinion

Rives v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1991No. 89-9530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Eight former employees of the Union Pacific Motor Freight Company (petitioners) appeal a decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) denying them labor protective conditions following consolidation of three major railroads. Petitioners contend that the ICC erred in determining that they were not entitled to mandatory labor protection under 49 U.S.C. § 11347, and, alternatively, in failing to exercise its discretion to award labor protection benefits under 49 U.S.C. § 11344.

This appeal arises out of the consolidation of three western railroads, the Union Pacific…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Young v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paul's Beauty College v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  2. Rives, II v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API