Legal Opinion

Smith v. Doe

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 14, 2005No. 26063Published

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

Jane Smith (Smith) brought this action to establish paternity and award child support. The family court declared that John Doe (Doe) was the father and ordered Doe to pay child support. The court of appeals held that Doe had an ongoing duty to support the child (Danielle) and that the action was not barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal, the court of appeals held that the amount of the child support award was reasonable. We affirm the court of appeals.

Factual / Procedural Background

The child in the present case, Danielle, was thirty-four years old when this action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilstrap Ex Rel. Gilstrap v. South Carolina Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Riggs v. RiggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. LowmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API