Legal Opinion

Herndon v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1991No. 8927SC1397PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

At the outset, we note that “G.S. 1-277, in effect, provides that no appeal lies to an appellate court from an interlocutory order or ruling of the trial judge unless such ruling or order deprives the appellant of a substantial right which he would lose if the ruling or order is not reviewed before final judgment.” Pruitt v. Williams, 288 N.C. 368, 371, 218 S.E.2d 348, 350 (1975). “Generally, the denial of summary judgment does not affect a substantial right and is not appealable.” Corum v. University of North Carolina, 97 N.C. App. 527, 531, 389 S.E.2d 596, 598, temporary stay…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pruitt v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Wiggins v. City of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Edwards v. AkionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Taylor v. AshburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Davis v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Slade v. VernonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Moore v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API