Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Insurance Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 12, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. is obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiff in an underlying action entitled Marro v TPK Constr. Corp., pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 1263/97, the defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated October 30, 2001, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment declaring that Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. is obligated to defend…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Frontier Insulation Contractors, Inc. v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Deetjen v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by6 opinions
- Exeter Building Corp. v. Scottsdale InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Anastasis v. American Safety Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Rhodes v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Allianz Insurance v. LernerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Pagano v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.