Legal Opinion

DiMaggio v. MYSTIC BUILDING WRECKING CO. INC.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 11, 1960PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Two counts in this action of tort were tried: count 7 for trespass and damage to real estate, on which there was a verdict for the defendant (Wrecking), and count 8 for conversion of personal property on which the plaintiff (DiMaggio) had a verdict. The action, originally brought also against the city of Boston (the city) and its building commissioner (the commissioner), was discontinued against them. DiMaggio’s exceptions are to the denial of requested instructions in connection with count 7 and to the instructions given. Wrecking’s exceptions are to the denial of motions for a directed…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Milligan v. Board of Registration in PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Gildea v. EllershawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Leppo v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Goldman v. Planning Board of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API