Legal Opinion

Aronstein v. New York Central Railroad

New York City Court

Decided July 13, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGenxtng, J.

This is a controversy submitted on an agreed statement of facts. Plaintiff seeks to recover for damage in transit to property moving in interstate commerce. Liability is conceded. Three rugs of different weight and value were wrapped in one bale of burlap, weighing 152 pounds, and one rug was wrapped in one bale, weighing 11 pounds, making a gross weight of 163 pounds. The freight charges applicable and paid by the consignee upon delivery amounted to three dollars and forty-one cents, which was determined by applying the first-class rate of two dollars nine and one-half cents per 100 pounds…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad v. Peninsula Produce ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mickey Finn Clothes, Inc. v. Yale Transport Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API