Legal Opinion

Vertis Group, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge McCLOSKEY.

The Vertis Group, Inc., Crain/Hallas Corporation, Lawrence Crain, Joyce Hal-las Crain, Mark Crain and Brian Crain, individuals and successors-in-interest to Crain/Hallas Corporation (hereafter collectively referred to as the Vertis Group)1 petition for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (the PUC), granting in part and denying in part the exceptions filed by the Vertis Group in response to a decision from an administrative law judge (ALJ). Further, the PUC order followed the recommendation of the ALJ and dismissed a complaint filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. UderraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Wertz v. Chapman TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. One (1) 1984 Z-28 Camaro CoupeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Division, Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Mountainview Thoroughbred Racing Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. UGI Utilities, Inc.—Gas Division v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. UGI Utilities, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Vertis Group, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API