Legal Opinion

Said v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 10, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2015-1289Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) CHERYL RENEE SAID, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-1289 (RBW) ) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER ) CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, Cheryl Renee Said, instituted this civil action against the defendant, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2 to -7 (2012) (“Title VII”), § 1981 of the Civil Rights…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API