Legal Opinion

Rheaume v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1983No. Civ. 10415PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs, Lindsey Rheaume, Robert Kjenstad, and William F. Saefke (the Students) filed a declaratory judgment action requesting the District Court of Burleigh County to construe, as it relates to them, Section 15-10-18.3, N.D.C.C., which provides in relevant part:

“15-10-18.3. Free tuition in North Dakota institutions of higher education. Any dependent, as defined in section 15-10-18.2 upon being duly accepted for enrollment into any North Dakota state-supported institution of higher education or state-supported technical or vocational school, shall be allowed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall GMC, Inc. v. Crane Carrier Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Morton County v. HenkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rothe v. S-N-Go Stores, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Victory Park Apartments, Inc. v. AxelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Haggard v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ladish Malting Co. v. Stutsman County Ex Rel. Stutsman County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. CouttsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API