Legal Opinion

Vanderford v. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1996No. WD 51472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellants appeal the denial of their motion for attorney fees on appeal which was filed on March 30, 1995. They assert that the trial court erred in denying their application for attorney fees on appeal for a lack of jurisdiction because there is no Missouri rule or case law that sets forth the proper procedure and timing of a motion for attorney fees post-trial. We affirm.

FACTS

The underlying action arose out of a contract of farm insurance issued by respondent, Cameron Mutual Insurance Company, to appellants. Appellants claimed that one of their concrete silos collapsed due to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Papin v. PapinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. McPherson Redevelopment Corp. v. SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Rosenblum v. GibbonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Pierce v. State of Missouri Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Gaunt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Estate of Schler v. BensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Clark v. KinseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API