Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 2004PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudock, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the order of the trial court denying Appellant’s pretrial motion for habeas corpus relief. We quash.

¶ 2 The trial court summarized the pertinent facts as follows:

Police Officer Walter McCrae testified that while on routine patrol as a Philadelphia Police Officer, he responded to a radio call that brought him to 5031 Summer Street. Following arrival at this location, [Officer McCrae] met the property’s real estate broker, Arthur Urba-ny. Mr. Urbany told Officer McCrae that he had permission to act with regard to the property and provided identification and a power of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WojdakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. TylerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Buchanan v. VerbonitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. RosarioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. OuchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Com. v. Lambert, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API