Legal Opinion
Cook v. Hinrichs
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided August 8, 2007No. CIV 07-4108PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PIERSOL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the petitioner’s application for writ of mandamus seeking to stop his prosecution in Magistrate Court in Minnehaha County, South Dakota. Petitioner seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Having reviewed the petitioner’s financial affidavit, the Court finds that he satisfies the requirements to proceed without prepayment of fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Petitioner will remain responsible to pay the $350.00 filing fee when he is financially able.
Under section 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court must next determine whether…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Julius v. Minnehaha County States AttorneyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024
- Reed v. TurnbullDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021