In re the Personal Restraint of Stockwell
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*175¶1 A jury convicted Daniel Stockwell of first degree child molestation and attempted first degree child molestation of his step-granddaughters, E.M. and M.S. The trial court found Stockwell was a persistent offender and sentenced him to life without the possibility of parole. On direct appeal, we and the Washington Supreme Court affirmed the convictions and sentence. In this timely personal restraint petition (PRP), Stockwell argues (1) his prior 1986 conviction for first degree statutory rape is not comparable to the current crime of first degree child rape, (2) the trial court erred by…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Presley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of CoplandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State of Washington v. Dallin David FortCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. ChouapCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. SlertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.