State ex rel. Meek v. Gleason
Supreme Court of Florida
Almon R. Meek, Attorney-General of the State of Florida, who, for the people of the State of Florida, prosecutes, in this behalf, comes here into the said Supreme Court, and moves the said court to strike out from the answer or return made to said rule, the causes or grounds therein shown, stated, and set forth, numbered respectively nine, ten, eleven, and thirteen, for irrelevancy and impertinence. , Almon R. Meek, Attorney-General. After argument,
1Opinion of the Court 1
RANDALL,'C. J.,
delivered the opinión of the court.
The respondent, by way of showing cause why a writ should not issue upon the information filed herein, urges reasons, numbered respectively from one to thirteen.
The Attorney-General moves to strike out, as irrelevant and impertinent, the causes numbered 9, 10, 11 and 13.
This motion has been Arery fully and faithfully argued, and incidentally, the merits of nearly all the points made by the respondent have been discussed.
The causes sought to be struck out by this motion, are substantially as follows:
9th. Because Harrison Reed, since his…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Randall.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- MINOR v. the Mechanics Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Fowler v. BebeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
- People v. HopsonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Wilcox v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- New York & Maryland Line R. Co. v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Savage v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
- Toncray v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Caples v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Lake v. State ex rel. PalmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.