Legal Opinion

Blaw Knox Corp. v. AMR Industries, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 11, 1990No. 90 Misc. 18PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGISTRATE’S RECOMMENDATION TO THE HONORABLE TERENCE T. EVANS

AARON E. GOODSTEIN, United States Magistrate.

Plaintiff Blaw Knox Corporation obtained a default judgment against the defendant AMR Industries, Inc. in the amount of $8,515,490.62 plus pre-judgment interest on February 3, 1989 in the Western District of Pennsylvania.

In an effort to determine what assets, if any, of AMR exist, Blaw Knox sought to depose Wisconsin residents Jerry Coleman and Robert J. Coleman. Both are shareholders and former directors and officers of AMR, having resigned in 1988. Service of a subpoena duces tecum was…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. IES Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. Mid-Dakota Clinic P.C. v. KolsrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Rock Bay, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Trustees of North Florida Operating Engineers Health v. Lane Crane Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
  5. Fuddruckers, Inc. v. KCOB I, L.L.C.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API