Legal Opinion

Holden v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 6, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaRt, J.

Sol Holden prosecutes this appeal to reverse a judgment of conviction against him for grand larceny, charged to have been committed by stealing 1,200 lbs. of seed cotton of the value of $100, the property of E. E. Eice.

The first assignment of error is that the verdict is not legally supported by the evidence.

On the part of the State it Avas shown that the cotton in question was grown on the farm of R. R. Rice, in Lincoln County, Arkansas, by a negro called Cool Shorty. Shorty was to pay one-fourth of the cotton raised by him as rent. He was also indebted to Rice for supplies, and it was their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. State v. EsmondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoover v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Mahan v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API