Legal Opinion

Fogleman v. Roy O. Martin Industries, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1983No. 83-149PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

Mrs. Thelma E. Fogleman and Perry H. Fogleman sued Roy 0. Martin Industries, Inc., and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation to rescind a timber sale alleging lesion beyond moiety. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiffs, which entitled them to the difference between the amount originally paid (the lesionary price) and the fair market value at the time of the contract. The defendant lumber companies have appealed.

FACTS

In addition to other property, Perry H. Fogleman and his mother, Thelma E. Fogle-man, each owned an undivided one-half interest in a 580-acre tract of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SalassiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Burrell v. KirkpatrickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Bisco v. MiddletonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Cheramie v. St. PierreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Succession of Crowe v. HenryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Fogleman v. Roy O. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  3. Fogleman v. Roy O. Martin Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  4. Succession of Chambers v. ChambersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API